In a heavily publicized two candidate race it is virtually impossible for one candidate to score 100% of the votes in large precincts, especially in major metropolitan areas. Perhaps it might occur in a few small- to medium-sized precincts, but virtually never in large precincts of over 300 voters. Moreover, could this really occur in dozens of precincts in single major cities?
This is precisely what happened in numerous Ohio and Pennsylvania precincts. Are people are to believe that this happened in some 20 precincts in Cuyahoga County alone? Yet, in this county Barack Obama achieved more than 99% of the vote in over 100 different precincts, districts where out of hundreds of votes Romney received only one or two votes. A similar trend occurred in Philadelphia. Both these trends must be investigated.
These numerical aberrations raise the suspicion of electronic vote rigging. Regardless, there were numerous reports of Romney votes being registered for Obama throughout the state. This means that an Obama presidency was pre-determined, while Romney—or any other Republican nominee–would be cheated out of the presidency. In Cleveland-area Cuyahoga County Barack Obama received 100% of the votes in 20 precincts, amounting to 5978 votes versus zero for Romney. Yes, zero. There were 2 votes for Gary Johnson also ‘recorded’ in those precincts, while none for any others.
As first reported by Before It’s News’ Michael Snyder in 25 other Cleveland-area precincts Obama received over 99% of the vote, with Romney scoring in each case only one vote. That, too, is impossible.
Now, wouldn’t it be expected that in all those precincts there would be at least one person in supposedly Obama-loving Cleveland that was not part of the norm, that was disenfranchised by the Obama regime, sick of the horrid economy, tired and frustrated with the corruption.
Is Cleveland really that abnormal? In particular, in write-in friendly Philly it would be expected that here, too, 99%-plus voting would never occur, considering the disenfranchisement of the people; surely, there would be write-in votes for Ron Paul and/or electronic ones for Romney that amounted to more than 1%.
One thing that was abnormal was how the voting machines responded to attempted Romney votes. Noted Marion, Ohio, voter, Joan Stevens, every time she tried to vote for Romney on her touchscreen machine Obama’s name would register. After the fourth attempt, finally, Romney’s name appeared. Noted Stevens:
“I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,” said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.
Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.
“I went to vote and I got right in the middle of Romney’s name,”
Stevens told Fox News, saying that she was certain to put her finger directly on her choice for the White House.
She said that the first time she pushed “Romney,” the machine marked “Obama.”
So she pushed Romney again. Obama came up again. Then it happened a third time.
“Maybe you make a mistake once, but not three times.”
Examples taken directly from the Cleveland Board of Elections are as follows, in the order of Obama then Romney (picked randomly from over
50 such precincts):
A Sampling of Zero Vote Precincts, 2012, Obama to Romney
0192 CLEVELAND -04-L: 388 – 0
0204 CLEVELAND -05-E: 597 – 0
0205 CLEVELAND -05-F: 483 – 0
0206 CLEVELAND -05-G: 257 – 0
0219 CLEVELAND -05-T: 386 – 0
0228 CLEVELAND -06-H: 405 – 0
A Sampling of the Same Precincts, 2008, Obama to McCain
0192 CLEVELAND -04-L: 427 – 3
0204 CLEVELAND -05-E: 506 – 0
0205 CLEVELAND -05-F: 680 – 1
0206 CLEVELAND -05-G: 501 – 10
0219 CLEVELAND -05-T: 625 – 3
0228 CLEVELAND -06-H: 426 – 0
A Sampling of One Vote Precincts, 2012, Obama to Romney
0118 CLEVELAND -01-A: 438 – 1
0144 CLEVELAND -02-G: 532 – 1
0183 CLEVELAND -04-C: 548 – 1
0185 CLEVELAND -04-E: 522 – 1
0190 CLEVELAND -04-J: 434 – 1
A Sampling of One Vote Precincts, 2008, Obama to McCain
0118 CLEVELAND -01-A: 481 – 4
0144 CLEVELAND -02-G: 620 – 3
0183 CLEVELAND -04-C: 351 – 2
0185 CLEVELAND -04-E: 370 – 2
0190 CLEVELAND -04-J: 504 – 0
These low numbers do not prove fraud nor do they rule it out. It is possible that vote rigging was committed in these precincts in both 2008′ and 2012′. More investigation is required plus, rigging could have been committed here through absentee ballots.
Calls were made to the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections. The people, there, are cooperating with the investigation. Note: spread sheets are being created. There is no ultimate proof yet. In further calls the response is “We are looking into this before it is certified. We are aware that this is being reported all over on the blogs.”
Please help by telling any Paul, Johnson, Goode, and Romney voters in the suspect precincts to submit their affidavits.
This is a call for all Romney, Paul, Johnson, and Goode voters in Cuyahoga County and other suspect precincts to take action and submit their affidavits, especially in all large precincts, where Romney (or even Obama in some instances) received no votes or less than 2% of the votes. Obama affidavits will also be taken, but the focus here, too, must be on suspect precincts, as above.
This is a non-partisan effort to halt all election rigging. Submit the proof to verify your vote. Do so at WriteInRevolution.com. The affidavits are proof of your votes; there is no other way to ensure that your vote was counted. The same is true of those suspect precincts in Philadelphia, which again show dozens of precincts with 99% of the vote going to exclusively Obama.